Karve — a native Windows alternative to Bruno
Karve and Bruno agree on the big idea — requests belong in plain files on disk, versioned with your code, not locked in a cloud account. Karve takes the native Windows route: the standard .http format your editor already understands, organized into folders in a desktop app that feels at home on the platform, bought once. Bruno is an open-source, Git-native ecosystem with its own .bru format, a Git UI, and a CLI — more to assemble, and more it can do.
Why Karve
What you get
The files-on-disk idea in a polished native Windows app, using the standard .http format your editor already understands — organized into folders, no separate .bru format, Git UI, or CLI to learn. A lower onboarding bar for QA, backend, and mixed-skill teammates.
What it leaves out — on purpose
No open-source code, no built-in Git UI or CLI, no GraphQL/gRPC/WebSocket, Windows-only. Karve trades the bigger toolkit for a smaller surface that's faster to roll out and explain.
Side by side
| Dimension | Karve | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| Platform & engine | Native WinUI 3, no Electron | Electron desktop + CLI |
| Licensing & price | Proprietary; $39.99 one-time | Open source $0; Pro $6 / Ultimate $11 per user/mo billed annually — that's $72 / $132 per user every year |
| Files & Git | Standard .http; diff in Git | Own .bru format; Git-native with built-in Git UI |
| Organize requests | Virtual folders over files from any repo; files never move | Git-native collections |
| Protocols | REST / HTTP | REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket |
| CLI & automation | None | Strong CLI; JSON/JUnit/HTML reports, CI/CD |
| Team | None — single-user tool | Via Git; SAML SSO, SCIM on paid plans |
Bruno details reflect its public product and pricing pages; Karve's reflect the shipping v1.0 scope. "On the roadmap" means planned, not yet available.
Where Karve fits
Bruno is the closest tool to Karve in philosophy, so the honest contrast isn't local-first versus local-first — it's friction. Bruno asks you to adopt its .bru format and lean into a Git-centric way of working, with a built-in Git UI and CLI as part of the package. That's powerful, and for some teams exactly right.
Karve trades that for a smaller surface: the standard .http format your editor already understands, a native Windows app that feels at home on the platform, and a lower onboarding bar for QA, backend, and mixed-skill teammates who just want to send a request and read the response.
What Bruno does that Karve doesn't
- Open source, with a deeply Git-native workflow and a built-in Git UI.
- A strong CLI with JSON/JUnit/HTML reports for CI/CD.
- GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket alongside REST.
- OAuth 2.0 with automatic token management, a collection runner, and data-driven testing.
- Cross-platform builds and enterprise options (SAML SSO, SCIM).
Karve doesn't chase the open-source, Git-native, CLI-first path — it trades it for a smaller native Windows app with nothing to assemble.
FAQ
Both store requests as files — what's the difference?
Bruno uses its own .bru format with a Git-native workflow and CLI; Karve uses the standard .http format in a native Windows app with fewer moving parts and a one-time price.
Does Karve use the .bru format?
No — Karve uses .http files. The two formats aren't interchangeable.
Does Karve have a CLI?
Not in v1. Bruno has a strong CLI with reports for CI/CD.
On Karve's roadmap
Everything above is Karve's shipping v1.0 — what's in the app today. A few things are planned for upcoming v1.x updates, included in the one-time price and not yet available:
See the full roadmap for what's coming and what's deliberately out of scope.
More comparisons
Organize and run your .http requests.
$39.99, one-time. No account, no subscription — a native Windows workspace you own forever.
No account · No subscription · No metered requests
25% off now